Home » Opinion » Comments » Targeting Google

Targeting Google

All comments (27) | Post Comment

The opinions expressed in this discussion do not necessarily represent those of The Prague Post.

#1 Posted by

Jiri Hubacek
Mar 11, 2010 4:55 pm CET

"Since you don't know me, this comment is quite bizarre. Perhaps you are unhappy in your own life and take your frustration out on other people."

I don't know you but you advertize your mentality on this blog for anybody to comment on.

Your comment about my welfare is quite touching.
Perhaps your Psychology101 will help you to get ahead of the confused maze of your mind?

#2 Posted by

Jiri Hubacek
Mar 11, 2010 4:51 pm CET

"My feeling is that you have something to hide, Jiri Hubacek. Perhaps the children of Victoria have more to worry about than their parents realise!"

Your libelous outpouring of bile is almost amusing.Your mentality is clear for anybody to see.

#3 Posted by

Jiri Hubacek
Mar 11, 2010 4:48 pm CET

"When you have learnt a new word you keep on using it, regardless of the context, don't you! This can be a good way to improve your English. But just be careful that if you use the word at random you will soon forget its correct meaning."

If it fits,I will use it.It fits most of your comments.

#4 Posted by

Alexia Lincoln
Unregistered user
Mar 11, 2010 3:27 pm CET

"This inane sophistry was already tried."

When you have learnt a new word you keep on using it, regardless of the context, don't you! This can be a good way to improve your English. But just be careful that if you use the word at random you will soon forget its correct meaning.

#5 Posted by

Margaret Donaldson
Unregistered user
Mar 11, 2010 3:01 pm CET

"Much as people who protect children from molesters "push their ideas on others", eh, Jiri"

My feeling is that you have something to hide, Jiri Hubacek. Perhaps the children of Victoria have more to worry about than their parents realise!

#6 Posted by

William Anderson
Unregistered user
Mar 11, 2010 3:00 pm CET

"Why are you such thoughtless and clueless individual?"

This sentence makes no sense. Are you trying to say "Why are you such a thoughtless...."? Since you don't know me, this comment is quite bizarre. Perhaps you are unhappy in your own life and take your frustration out on other people.

#7 Posted by

Jiri Hubacek
Mar 11, 2010 2:38 pm CET

"Why are you such an abusive jerk?"

Why are you such thoughtless and clueless individual?

#8 Posted by

Jiri Hubacek
Mar 11, 2010 2:36 pm CET

"Much as people who protect children from molesters "push their ideas on others", eh, Jiri?"

You have a short memory girl.This inane sophistry was already tried.

#9 Posted by

Jiri Hubacek
Mar 11, 2010 2:35 pm CET

"As with most of your behaviour, you are one of billions of people who is incapable of independent thought. You believe what you are told by the government, and you do what everybody around you does without thinking. If you had lived in Germany in the 1930s you would have been in the front row at Nuremberg; instead, you are a cheer-leader for the bloodshed in Iraq and Afghanistan. You would follow-the-leader over a cliff if you were told to."

That is right Peggy.I was so enamoured of my government and its action that I left the country when I got the chance.
I am afraid that you have no sense of understanding save your self dellussions and self-importance.

#10 Posted by

Alexia Lincoln
Unregistered user
Mar 10, 2010 8:23 pm CET

"A misprint as you must know."

The word you are looking for is 'typo': the word misprint is not used in this context. Is "emphatize" another "misprint"? I know that you have probably never had the chance to visit an English-speaking country; however, there are plenty of dictionaries available, even on-line.

"My problem is not with that but rather with the way they push their ideas on others."

Much as people who protect children from molesters "push their ideas on others", eh, Jiri?

#11 Posted by

William Anderson
Unregistered user
Mar 10, 2010 7:44 pm CET

>>Write hundred times:
I will pay more attention to what I am reading.

Why are you such an abusive jerk?

#12 Posted by

Jiri Hubacek
Mar 10, 2010 3:03 pm CET

"What is "animalrotein"? And what does "emphatize" mean?"

A misprint as you must know.
To emphatize in this context is that I do understand why they do not eat animals.
My problem is not with that but rather with the way they push their ideas on others.

In any case how did you manade to connect the matter of Google with "Animal Rights?"
The height of illogical thinking.

#13 Posted by

Jiri Hubacek
Mar 10, 2010 2:58 pm CET

"Do you have anything more intelligent to add to this discussion? If not, perhaps it would be better if you kept quiet. Failing that, please explain why one kind of abuse is "okay" in your mind but another isn't."

I was refering to inane comparisons,therefore my usage of term sophistry.'If you pay any attention to what you read,you would know.

Write hundred times:
I will pay more attention to what I am reading.

#14 Posted by

Margaret Donaldson
Unregistered user
Mar 10, 2010 1:12 pm CET

|am just one of billions of people who eats meat."

As with most of your behaviour, you are one of billions of people who is incapable of independent thought. You believe what you are told by the government, and you do what everybody around you does without thinking. If you had lived in Germany in the 1930s you would have been in the front row at Nuremberg; instead, you are a cheer-leader for the bloodshed in Iraq and Afghanistan. You would follow-the-leader over a cliff if you were told to.

#15 Posted by

Alexia Lincoln
Unregistered user
Mar 10, 2010 9:08 am CET

"I emphatize with the people who for any reason won't consume an animalrotein but will not yield to a few who wants to dictate their philosophy."

What is "animalrotein"? And what does "emphatize" mean?

The fact remains, Jiri, that you are indifferent to the suffering suffered by the animals whose bodies you eat. Whether or not other people are as well is, obviously, entirely irrelevant.

#16 Posted by

Jiri Hubacek
Mar 10, 2010 4:57 am CET

"There is nothing "absurd" about having the capacity to empathize with the suffering of others. What is absurd is that people like you pay for the diseased, tortured bodies of animals who have spent their entire lives living in tiny cages in factory farms and yet somehow manage to maintain the delusion - at least in your own twisted mind - that you are an ethical, decent human being"

I am just one of billions of people who eats meat.If you try to attack my feeding habits you can as well attack overwhelming majority of people about this way to sustain our bodies.
Your silly diatribes will not move me- nor anybody else.

I emphatize with the people who for any reason won't consume an animalrotein but will not yield to a few who wants to dictate their philosophy.
Get it girl?

#17 Posted by

Alexia Lincoln
Unregistered user
Mar 9, 2010 8:11 pm CET

"Tell me what spiders are doing to its prey."

I am glad to hear that you don't consider yourself any more worthy than a spider. Given the brainless comments which you write on this site - and your inability to write proper English - this is quite a reasonable assessment.

As far as your idiotic comparison between factory farming and spiders is concerned: this simply shows that you are completely heartless. Spiders have no choice about how they contain their prey but humans could easily raise animals for food without abusing them so cruelly.

#18 Posted by

William Anderson
Unregistered user
Mar 9, 2010 7:02 pm CET

"Inane sophistry.That is all I will say to that."

Do you have anything more intelligent to add to this discussion? If not, perhaps it would be better if you kept quiet. Failing that, please explain why one kind of abuse is "okay" in your mind but another isn't.

#19 Posted by

Jiri Hubacek
Mar 9, 2010 4:54 pm CET

"Unfortunately this isn't the problem. The problem is that humans, unlike other animals, keep their prey in atrocious conditions - crammed into tiny cages - in order to save a few dollars."

Tell me what spiders are doing to its prey.

#20 Posted by

Jiri Hubacek
Mar 9, 2010 4:52 pm CET

"That's right - just as those bleeding-heart liberals who object to child abuse stick their noses in other people's business. I am sure you wish they would stop."

Inane sophistry.That is all I will say to that.

#21 Posted by

William Anderson
Unregistered user
Mar 9, 2010 9:25 am CET

" force their philosophy on others"

That's right - just as those bleeding-heart liberals who object to child abuse stick their noses in other people's business. I am sure you wish they would stop.

"We,humans, are also -biologically-animals and do the same."

Unfortunately this isn't the problem. The problem is that humans, unlike other animals, keep their prey in atrocious conditions - crammed into tiny cages - in order to save a few dollars.

#22 Posted by

Alexia Lincoln
Unregistered user
Mar 8, 2010 5:37 pm CET

"an absurbities of those who decided not to eat animal protein and try to force their philosophy on others."

There is nothing "absurd" about having the capacity to empathize with the suffering of others. What is absurd is that people like you pay for the diseased, tortured bodies of animals who have spent their entire lives living in tiny cages in factory farms and yet somehow manage to maintain the delusion - at least in your own twisted mind - that you are an ethical, decent human being.

#23 Posted by

Jiri Hubacek
Mar 8, 2010 3:26 pm CET

"Plants don't have a nervous system, and cannot, therefore, feel pain. I am sorry if this concept is difficult to grasp."

No problem there.I was just trying to point out an absurbities of those who decided not to eat animal protein and try to force their philosophy on others.
In this "imperfectly" created universe the animals (and some plants) eat each other for sustenance.We,humans, are also -biologically-animals and do the same.It is a reality of life,although personally I do not support trophy hunting.

#24 Posted by

Alexia Lincoln
Unregistered user
Mar 6, 2010 8:48 am CET

"Everybody "knows" that plants have a "Secret Life".Those who consume them are evil too?"

Plants don't have a nervous system, and cannot, therefore, feel pain. I am sorry if this concept is difficult to grasp.

#25 Posted by

Jiri Hubacek
Mar 6, 2010 5:41 am CET

Everybody "knows" that plants have a "Secret Life".Those who consume them are evil too?

#26 Posted by

Jiri Hubacek
Mar 5, 2010 4:54 pm CET

" In January, Google threatened to pull out of China, stating concerns over human rights, censorship and privacy. But its real concern is Chinese hackers stealing its secret codes and other IP. Google's motto "Don't be evil" is branding, not a business plan."

I do not defend the corporation GOOGLE,but the above "real concern" is individual opinion based on personal belief-not something that is factual.

#27 Posted by

Alexia Lincoln
Unregistered user
Mar 4, 2010 6:31 pm CET

"Everyone knows that Google motto is, 'Don't be evil.' Is it all right? "

Causing pain and suffering to fish for selfish pleasure seems pretty evil to me.