|
|
Detention raises question of rights
A Prague professor, held by police as a possible threat, tells his side of the story
By
Kimberly Hiss
Staff Writer, The Prague Post
May 21st, 2008 issue
VLADIMÍR WEISS/THE PRAGUE POST |
|
Mark Tomass was reported by a fellow bus passenger for typing the words "Al Jazeera."
enlarge
|
“I was minding my own business,” said professor Mark Tomass of the uneventful start to a familiar bus ride from Brno, south Moravia, to Prague. But, when police boarded and detained Tomass after the words “Al Jazeera” had been spotted on his laptop computer screen by a fellow passenger, his business ceased to be his own. Director of business programs at the University of New York in Prague, Tomass is a Syrian-born American who lived in Boston before moving to the Czech Republic nine years ago. After teaching a regular class at Brno’s Masaryk University May 6, Tomass boarded a Student Agency bus back to Prague. As usual, a stewardess served coffee, passengers such as the middle-aged man next to him went back and forth to the restroom, and Tomass worked on his laptop, that morning revising a paper titled “Al Jazeera and the Decline of Secular Ideology.” When the bus stopped, however, Tomass looked up to realize they were not at their Florenc destination, but instead being held at the Roztyly station. About half of the passengers exited, and Tomass noticed the middle-aged passenger who’d been seated next to him talking to three policemen outside. When one of the officers then boarded and asked Tomass to step out of the bus, the professor grabbed his bag and followed, unable to imagine what the problem was. Once outside, the three officers informed Tomass that the passenger next to him had called the police after seeing the words “Al Jazeera” on his computer screen. Tomass confirmed that, yes, he had been writing about Al Jazeera and explained why. “I immediately told them I was a university professor, gave them my card, said I was writing a paper, and I asked what was wrong with that.” According to Tomass, the officer asked for his passport, then started to fill out a report and made a call to initiate a background check. While the bus was held at the stop, Tomass asked why he was being detained even after he had explained the situation. He added that the passenger who made the report must have been “ignorant” to feel threatened by the mere appearance of the words “Al Jazeera,” the name of an Arabic television station headquartered in Qatar. He asked how such an unfounded fear by an ordinary citizen could warrant his detention and background check, and was told by the officers that any such call about a perceived threat had to be investigated. “I don’t see how he could have in any way felt I was a threat to national security, to the bus or to the passengers,” Tomass countered. “And I don’t particularly look aggressive either.”Tomass argued with each of the officers in turn, asking what right they had to detain him, and requesting a written record of the incident, which he says he was denied. Once the background check was completed, his passport was returned. The 20-minute incident ended with Tomass getting back on the bus, which proceeded to the Florenc stop. On the way, he could hear the words “Al Jazeera” circulating among the passengers. “In a civilized world, you should not have something like this happening,” he said. “It can happen in war zones, but why here?” Making assumptionsAside from worrying about a police system that allows three officers to spend time on what he considers an “absolutely unnecessary” incident, Tomass is concerned about the reasons behind his detention. “They think: He has long hair, he has dark skin, he must be al-Qaida,” he said of the assumptions he fears are made by the public. But, when considering a fuller profile, he points out the ridiculousness of such hasty conclusions.“Most people actually assume I’m Spanish. I have an American passport, and I was writing a paper in English.” Prague department of the State Police spokeswoman Dana Slabochová confirmed the incident and said the case had been “closed without any further investigation necessary.” She added only that, procedurally, it was the duty of the involved officers to act as they did. “Patrols have to respond to all emergency calls received by the 158 emergency line.”But it’s the basis of that initial report that remains of concern to Tomass. “They were convinced that I was a threat based on the fact that one man saw one name,” he said. — Naďa Černá and Hela Balínová contributed to this report.
Other articles in News (21/05/2008):
Browse the Current Issue
|
Most visited in Business Listings
|
Reader's comments:
add your commentGlobal society continues to see another abuse by the police under the guise of "security". I wonder what excuses Hitler's henchmen used when they started screening the actions of its people.
And what about Sadaam's police or that of the Americans...all for the sake of security. Freedom of speech or expression...is that a past-time long gone by?
Is it a pipe dream that was suggested to us by some school teacher of the past? Where did it come from? Is it fact or fiction? Someone might suggest that freedoms of speech or expression are OK only when they are appropriate.
Well...who is to determine the criterion for what is appropriate? I say let's forget the whole thing. You had better keep your thoughts to yourself, because the moron next to you is thinking "God knows what" and will probably condemn you anyway if you are not on the same page as he is politically.
Al Jazeera, New York Times, or Prague Post...Does it really matter any more? Perhaps, we are all terrorists.
The Czech police are not "Charles University grads"...so go figure. When they hold up the stupid little red sign, you stop and be courteous...listen, say, yes, sir, and try to be in control of your emotions.
Once the incident passes, you go on with life having learned through experience the fiasco I refer to as the "Czech Police Cabaret".
I challenge others to share their experiences with the security conscious...
houston
The man sitting next to him, who probably didn't understand English well enough to understand what the Syrian-American was typing and who could be forgiven for his ignorance, believed, albeit mistakenly, that he was observing "suspicious activity," and so he did his civic duty and reported it.
The police simply responded to the phone call they received from the panicked Czech passenger who unnecessarily suspected the professor of terrorism. So, the police did their job as they had been trained to do it. Upon discovering that the man was not a threat in any way whatsoever, and that the panicking by the other passenger hadn't been necessary, they allowed the professor to continue on his journey in that very same bus.
Perhaps he was lucky.
In the United States, Muslim men have been arrested and denied the right to fly, just because of passengers complaining to flight attendants about seeing Muslims praying at an airport gate.
Perhaps the cops who responded to the emergency cell phone call also felt it was silly, but they were doing their jobs by investigating.
Bayonne, NJ
The public needs to stay on its guard and be prepared to perhaps look stupid when people get their concerns wrong.
I don't think this incident is surprising - even though it must have been annoying for Mark Tomass at the time
Prague
The Prague police presumably had a busy time the morning this article was printed!
Doha
I recently read that a huge number of Czechs would have a problem even have Arabs (or perhaps Muslims) as neighbors. (Never mind that a sizable minority of Arabs are Christians). Though most people are against it, I know (seemingly) perfectly intelligent, independent minded people in Prague who want the radar base, because they say Palestinians might attack the country with a missile.
The main problem is that so many people here - and not just here - are ignorant and/or xenophobic, as always.
Prague
plus a prefect hysteria.
Xenophobia plus ignorance.....
whether the public or the police.............
Shame !! on both
Prague
If something like this would have happened in the United States, the professor would be detained!
Prague
Not that I think necessarily that being detained for 20 minutes is a sacrifice.
The police have a job to do, and their job is to react to what they are told.
If some ignorant (or perhaps not having a great grasp of English) passenger calls the police about a suspected terrorist, the police should not be blamed for doing their jobs...
They did, and then the professor was free to go on his way.
The real problem here is two-fold: general ignorance and fear-mongering of the public coupled with the woe-is-me victimization of adopted citizens tendency towards self-victimization.
There, I said it.
Atlanta
Eh...so in one country a few bombs go off and four Muslims are framed. And from then on, all dark-skinned people are to be regarded as a possible threat?
It's sad to see how easily people are brainwashed by their governments.
Olomouc
Prague
Prague
Of course the Czech passenger on the bus over-reacted, but that doesn't mean he is xenophobic. He was simply anxious and uncomfortable without reason. The news makes people afraid. The police certainly were not xenophobic just because they didn't refuse to come when the Czech passenger called the police, because when someone suspects a crime and calls the police, the police are supposed to investigate. That's all they did, but the man hadn't done anything wrong, so they let him go. In America, I think he might have been treated much worse.
Don't be so quick to stereotype all Czech people as racists and xenophobes. Most Czechs are not really.
Bayonne, NJ
Nevertheless, idiocy and inefficiency cannot become a compliment.
The first guilty person was that passenger.
The next time I take a Czech bus, I shall open a porno page on my lap-top....or some Czech news about daily and local corruption cases !
I bet you that same passenger would not even notice it.
amsterdam
Add your comment