|
||||||||||||||
|
May 17th, 2008
|
||||||||||||||
|
Radar treaty to be signed in JuneNATO head outlines base's European role in missile defenseBy Markéta Hulpachová Staff Writer, The Prague Post May 7th, 2008 issue Officials now say a Czech-U.S. radar treaty could be signed in June.U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice was expected to sign the treaty at an international missile-defense conference held May 5 in Prague. She could not attend, however, because of her busy schedule, U.S. officials said.No new date has been set.“It is likely Rice will come sometime in June to sign the treaty,” said Foreign Affairs Ministry spokeswoman Zuzana Opletalová.Polls show about two-thirds of residents are against plans to build a U.S. radar base on Czech soil. It is expected to be built on the Brdy military grounds, about 90 kilometers (56 miles) southwest of Prague.During the conference, NATO Secretary General Jaap de Hoop Scheffer stressed the significance of the planned base and outlined its potential incorporation into a NATO missile-defense system. Scheffer said a more comprehensive apparatus linking NATO, U.S. and national systems is needed to cover all European allies. He also called U.S. plans to install the two-part defense system in Poland and the Czech Republic a “substantial contribution” to European security. “We need both the U.S. missile-defense elements and other sensors and interceptors,” he said. “Several architectures are currently being studied, with a view to inform further debate and potential decisions at the next NATO summit in 2009.”Scheffer’s statement addressed the concerns of a group of local deputies, who have said they will not agree to ratify a Czech-U.S treaty in Parliament until the radar is incorporated into NATO plans.U.S. and local defense officials also discussed a separate treaty to allow about 100 U.S. soldiers to be based at Brdy. Terms of the Status of Forces Agreement, or SOFA, are still being negotiated.“The outstanding issues regarding SOFA are of a legal and technical nature,” said Defense Ministry spokesman Andrej Čírtek. “We hope negotiations will be completed as soon as possible.”Čírtek said no date has been set to sign the agreement governing U.S. forces. It may be signed together with the radar treaty, according to Deputy Prime Minister Alexander Vondra.Local leaders, experts and diplomats, including U.S. Assistant Secretary of State John Rood, attended the conference to discuss future and existing security threats and future transatlantic cooperation on missile defense. Markéta Hulpachová can be reached at mhulpachova@praguepost.com Other articles in News (7/05/2008):
|
Most visited in Book of Lists |
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
Reader's comments:
add your commentHouston
I wonder how he would feel if his country had foreign military bases in it.
Prague
In any case, the radar base is a complete nonsense since there is no country in the world which has any interest in attacking our country. The missile bases, of courst will change that, and make us a target.
Disgracefully, the Prague Post has made no attempt to determine the true function of these bases.
Prague
Mr. Haskett did, however, allude to the fact that they were the major opponent to the base.
Funny thing is, it is true that a missile from Iran or North Korea cannot hit the United States, presently.
They can however, hit the Czech Republic and other European nations, thus the NATO Secretary General's acknowledgment of its need!
Ms. you know who, again seems to forget that the Czech Republic has had foreign soldiers on its soil for how long...:}
Funny that those soldiers have never been of the nations that freed them from occupiers (the United Kingdom, France, the United States, etc.)
Maybe a western occupying force of a whopping 200 will really alter the demographics, eh?! Czechs chose their system of election, and its 278 members have spoken on behalf of its citizens.
For Ms. "I sound off against the United States at every chance I get," she has about as much voice in that country as the Prague Post has a responsibility to attempt to determine the true function of the bases...that is just foolish comment.
Does Mr. Ainsworth think that the 100,000 Americans in Germany over the past decade-plus made them a target too?
History has shown not! We have been in many countries throughout Europe since you were in diapers...and welcomed.
The Germans in towns like Stuggart and Heidelberg are worried about our departure and their economies thereafter...and rightfully so. The Czechs will benefit greatly from this in time and know it. It was a wise move on behalf of their elected leaders, small uneducated folk need not apply...:}
San Fran
The U.S. Senate ratified the NATO treaty and will also have to ratify any radar treaty that might emerge.
The following year, I was awarded the Czech Presidential Medal by President Václav Havel, so I have little sympathy for those who believe the only opposition to the pending missile-defense system emanates from those sympathetic to a Russian point of view.
I don't buy the fact that Condoleezza Rice's schedule did not permit her to be in the Czech Republic for a projected May 5th signing.
Hulpachova's article only briefly touches upon the fact that the signing of a U.S. anti-missile defense treaty in the Czech Republic has been pushed forward by a full month.
As an American reader of the Prague Post; the issue of when and if the Czech and/or Polish governments sign this treaty and further political concessions under negotiation, such as requests by Czech military officials for two additional C-130 transport airplanes and updating of the Czech anti-missile defense system have as much interest on our side of the Atlantic as yours.
In the view of many experts in anti-missile technologies, this tested system is flawed. In the view of many American citizens, this treaty and the system it brings comes at too high a cost juxtaposed against our current economy and deteriorating roads, bridges, highways and tunnels.
In the view of the U.S. Senate Armed Services Committee in July of 2007, the anti-missile technology in question was so unreliable that they cut the Bush Administration's funding $310 million funding request by nearly one-half.
The last time I checked the Czech bourse, the crown is soaring and the Czech economy is healthy. If the Czech government wants to enhance its national security it has a vast array of options available other than the American taxpayer.
Minneapolis
You wish! You need to stop watching U.S. propaganda stations and get out of the United States.
I challenge you to find *anyone* in Germany who wants U.S. troops occupying German soil.
>>100,000 Americans in Germany over the past decade-plus
Quite where you got this figure from is not clear. American troops invaded Germany during the second World War and have stayed on ever since. They were not welcome then, and they are not welcome now.
Incidentally, the figure of 100,000 is wrong as well.
Prague
Because they value the money that the American taxpayer is kindly contributing to their economies. Not because they think that they are likely to be invaded by North Korea if the troops pull out.
LA
You must be new to the area...and we are not in Spain, Italy, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, etc.
Go to USAJOBS.com and look before you speak. This is bases...not just soldiers.
They have been there for decades.
Get out of the United States? I just left Prague after eight years due to the pollution, overpriced everything and low earnings!
Do you think that Germany just let the United States stay and build bases? Delusional again. It was agreed upon and has benefited both sides greatly.
Now, due to BRAC, we are closing them. You speak for the entire German nation on being welcomed? :}
Why not, you try to speak as the opinion of each Czech. :}
Having been stationed there, I can assure you the German-American alliance is still strong, even with our weak president who inflicted great damage on our nation.
To the last writer, agreed, it is because their economies exist due to our presence, not disputed ( I mentioned economy, not missiles as the reason).
How does new infrastructure, schools, sewer, business and upgraded military sound to the Czechs?
According to those that make the decisions, pretty good!
San Fran
You should at least look into these things prior to commenting.
There are 70,000 U.S. troops stationed in Germany. At LEAST another 30,000 civilians are working for the Department of Defense...
Germany contributes about a billion dollars a year to support U.S. forces....but we are not welcomed...OK, right :}
Americans spend more than $36 million in the region every year.
Everyone is opposed to this war and BUSH, but before you comment, you should investigate. Your comments show a severe bias against the United States, they NEVER come from a educated basis.
Many links could have given you this information. Here is one, and yes, PBS is a reputable source:
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/military/jan-june05/bases_3-24.html
San Fran
6 million dead! Shame on you for trying to turn that to benefit your one person crusade against the US.
San Fran
May 8 is celebrated as the Liberation Day on which Czechoslovakia was liberated from the Nazi Germany by the Russian Red Army as well as by the U.S. Third Army led by General Patton. No celebrations are taking place with the exceptions of the town of Plzen which is the most famous town to be liberated by Americans. As the rest of the country [generally speaking] was liberated by the Russians who ?came again? in 1968 and had occupied Czechoslovakia until 1989, people don't really feel like it.
NOW THATS AN INVASION AND STAYING! You have a lot of nerve, but not a lot of smarts...
http://czechdaily.wordpress.com/
San Fran
Mexico
It is a very reliable source of information about the official U.S. government position on anything.
Incidentally, you seem to have missed the point. Yes, of course the Germans are glad that stupid American taxpayers are subsidizing their (higher) standard of living.
However, nobody there thinks that the troops are protecting them from invasion.
Prague
Add your comment