|
|||||||||||||
|
September 8th, 2008
|
|||||||||||||
|
PostviewRath's credo: 'Do no harm' or 'get ahead'?Postview | Search restaurants | Archives November 9th, 2005 issue The Czech media have had a field day with the way President Václav Klaus handled David Rath's official appointment as new health minister. The swearing in lasted just three minutes! They didn't even drink a toast of champagne! How irregular! Perhaps. But all this was really just the culmination of the political fracas that led up to the appointment. Only days earlier, when it still looked as though Klaus would block Rath's appointment, the frustrated doctor hurled insults at Klaus, calling him, among other things, "a crotchety, senile man." The two have been at odds since the early 1990s, when Rath was hoping to enhance his career as a member of the Civic Democrat Party (ODS), which Klaus headed at the time. But personal animosity isn't the key issue here: The main reason Klaus refused to name Rath was the inevitable conflict of interest that would have been caused by Rath remaining president of the Czech Medical Chamber (C It's odd that there was a debate at all as to whether Rath might have a conflict of interest. The C Somewhat disturbingly, Rath downplayed that conflict of interest was a serious issue. In a comment that's probably telling about the state of Czech politics, he said that he has so many friends among doctors and in government positions that conflict of interest was unavoidable anyway. When Rath finally resigned from his C But ethics don't seem to worry Rath, who, as the C For all his faults, it's clear no one can accuse Rath of not being persistent. Before being courted by Prime Minister Jir As a 25-year-old freshly minted doctor in the early 1990s, he chose the ODS. For three years he tried with little success to get nominated to various positions and then left with disgust in 1994 "because the ODS harms the intellect," he told reporters. Two years later he tried his luck with the Freedom Union, but he left the party less than two years later and became an independent. Rath's opponents have mocked him for his careerism and desire to get ahead in politics at almost any cost. But now some people fear the wrath of Rath. He is known for rewarding the faithful and punishing those that have gone up against him in the past. Even before assuming the post, he threatened to replace Jir Mere ethical quibbling? Maybe. But now Rath is in a position to directly affect the lives and health of thousands of people who are dependent on the Czech health system, something urgently in need of reform. Is it too much to ask that someone with a degree of proven moral integrity be charged with this task? Other articles in Opinion (9/11/2005): Browse the Current Issue
|
Most visited in Business Listings |
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Be the first to add a comment!