The Prague Post Prague Post Dining Guide 2007
December 5th, 2008
Contact Us   |   Classifieds   |   Search:
 Home
 News
    Archives
    Live news feed
 Business
    Exchange Rates
    Banking & Finance
    Movers & Shakers
    10 Questions
    Tech & Telecom
    Business Directory
 Opinion
    Commentary
    Postview
 Night & Day
    Cinema Review
    Restaurant Review
    Gallery Review
 Tempo
 Special Sections
    Real Estate
    Schools&Education
    Health & Medicine
 Real Estate
    Rent
    Sales
 Book of Lists
    Article  Purchase online
    This week: Luxury Hotels  BOL Online
 Information
    This week's RSS feed rss feed
    Best of Prague
    Book shop
    Classifieds
    For Rent
    Job Offers
    Sponsored events
    Partner Hotels
    Visitor Information
    Dining Out Guide
    Alan Levy Tributes
 Services
    Subscribe
    Archives
    Photo Service
    Related Sites
    About Us
    Contact Us
 ADVERTISE with us
    Classifieds
    Online and Print

The lessons that lie in a 'cartoon crisis'

Postview

February 15, 2006

Whether you choose to call it "Europe's cartoon jihad" or, as USA Today thoughtfully dubs it, the "Cartoon crisis," the last couple of weeks have gotten weird. Good and weird.

Sketches that are intended to be humorous and, to most Western viewers' eyes, pretty innocent, published in a Danish newspaper few had ever heard of until last month, have generated a response that's included diplomatic expulsions, riots and caused at least 11 deaths.

Like most newspapers in Europe, and many around the globe, The Prague Post seriously debated running the cartoons of Muhammad that Jyllands-Posten ran late last year in solidarity with a Danish writer who could not find an illustrator for his book on the prophet of Islam. Graven images of Muhammad are, of course, forbidden to members of that faith, but presumably the Danish paper felt it had a point to make about whether everyone in Europe should feel similarly restricted.

The editors certainly never anticipated the kind of backlash their cartoons would create — and, in fact, it wasn't until four months after the sketches were printed that all hell began to break loose after apologies were demanded of the Danish government. But what has prompted so many other publications, including at least four in the Czech Republic, to publish the cartoons, is the idea that any offended party should feel a right to censor newspaper content.

Because of the weekly publication cycle of The Prague Post, which would have made this newspaper just one more member of the pack if it ran the cartoons, it was decided that a news report on the issue would add more insight. But one thing everyone in the media agrees on is that the cartoons themselves are almost beside the point.

Cultural sensitivity, when it takes the form of censorship and the gagging of members of the press whose work might offend some, is not viable. At the same time, no publication is justified in printing something intended mainly to provoke just for the sake of provoking.

Clearly the media's assertion of its independence is being misunderstood by many in the Islamic faith, who are in turn making themselves poorly understood through expressions of outrage and calls for violence. Denmark, like much of Western Europe, has a complex society with a rich mix of cultures, races and religions — far richer than the Czech Republic's essentially homogenous one.

No country can, or should, long remain isolated once artificial barriers, such as closed borders, are down. The energy, ideas and hard work that flows in with new peoples are the key to any country's success and dynamism.

But as the Danish and, now, West European, lesson has shown, what may look like a peacefully integrated community, may well be a tinderbox just waiting for a spark.

As this country continues its re-entry into the wide post-1989 world, enriching itself in the process, it would be wise to be sure that non-Czechs feel truly respected, involved and integrated.

And not because we fear violence if these goals aren't met, and not because we are afraid of expressing our independence — which, after all, means nothing if we bind ourselves to being inoffensive at all times.

Rather, we should fight for an inclusive, tolerant society because that's the only kind worth living in. It's also a point all of the world's great religions agree upon.



Reader's Comments:
[23/02/2006] : David Irving has been given a three year jail sentence for expressing political opinions which were unpopular with the Austrian government. A few years ago a publisher in Prague was prosecuted for publishing Mein Kampf in Czech. A law similar to the one which was used against Irving still exists in the Czech Republic.

"Freedom of expression" means precisely what it says. It doesn't mean "freedom of expression so long as we approve of the expression."

Your paper would like to publish cartoons which are offensive to Moslems - but it would *never* dream of running a cartoon which was offensive to Jews or black people. I don't remember the Prague Post defending Austria's most recent political prisoner, and nor did it defend the freedom of the translator of Mein Kampf. No wonder the moslems are cynical.
Matthew Peterson
Prague
[22/02/2006] : Though I unquestionably support the Danish paper's right to print the Muhammed cartoons, it has since been reported that the same publication that declined to print cartoons satirizing Christian images for fear of a public outcry. Given such a hypocritical double standard, it forces me to now defend their right to expression while holding my nose.
Clay Weatherford
Austin, Texas
[20/02/2006] : I didn't really expect you to publish the Mohammend cartoons. After all, discretion is advised for foreign-language newspapers that could easily wear out their welcome, and for whom trouble could be made. What would your Czech hosts say if a bunch of irresponsible outsiders were to call unwanted attention to a defenseless little country trying to keep a low profile? The Czechs could end up like the Danes, the poor saps; it wouldn't be right to get the whole country in trouble.

But reading the reasons you've presented for not publishing nearly caused me to snort like a four-legged animal with cloven hooves at the lameness of your justification. And God bless you for that. At least you haven't gone off the deep end of anti-Westernism or Stockholm-syndrome identification with the enemy like the previous letter-writer from Canada. Instead, reading your column is like scrutinizing the face of a hostage being forced to make a video statement at gunpoint - a blink of an eye, a split-second look, an unnatural monotone that says, I'm being forced to say this somewhat against my will; if not for this gun at my head I might well say something a bit different. Don't worry, I can read between the lines, and I know you're on the right side, generally, even if due to circumstances beyond your control you can't stand up for the public's right to know just at this moment.

It's clear from the tone of your statement that your decision not to publish the Mohammed cartoons has been made under duress. How else to account for the strange wording of your rationalization. The weekly publication cycle! Original, that. But when we're making sorry excuses one reason is never enough. So in the very same sentence you add another whopper, for good measure, about not wanting to be just another member of the pack. Instead, the Prague Post has bravely chosen membership in the herd, assuming the attitude of a bunch of cowed sheep listening with grave concern to the wolf's accusatory, sarcastic, toothy plea for sympathy.

"It was decided a news report would add more insight". Another unintentional howler, ironic especially in this country. The former Communist regime prohibited anyone from printing Charter 77 under penalty of imprisonment. It also demanded that anyone of any importance from actor to zookeeper sign a denunciation known as the "Anti-Charter". There is a whole sub-genre of mildly knee-slapping Charter 77 stories about the few zany cranks who refused to sign the Anti-Charter on the grounds they'd never read the original! Therefore I recommend that, in the interest of tolerance, fair play, rational inquiry, and a decent respect for the opinions of mankind (and not just those of bunch of embassy-burning louts), that judgement be suspended on the Mohammed caricatures until everyone has had a chance to see them.

"...according to most of the media, the cartoons are almost beside the point." You're right about that: If it weren't for the cartoons they'd have found something else. It is being demanded of us that we denounce the cartoons in the strongest terms possible without ever getting to see what the fuss is about. What they don't want us to see is that these little pictures, like Charter 77, are relatively innocuous. It would be a lot harder to pretend that the drawings are outrageous if people were allowed to see them.

"...many in the Islamic faith... are making themselves poorly understood through expressions of outrage and calls for violence." Wrong. They burned down the embassies, killed people, put Ronald MacDonald in the fire! That's more than a call for violence, that's violence itself, of a ritual nature that should itself be considered blasphemous. And with that they are making themselves absolutely, perfectly understood: Do what we say or else; in any case, your decadent culture is doomed. We'll show you what a real holocaust is all about.

At least you Prague media hacks have the excuse of relative vulnerability in comparison to the American hacks. Their cowardice is even less excusable, compounded by partisan and ideological anti-Westernism disguised as tolerance and polticial correctness. But if you have to be craven appeasers, the Prague Post would have done better to emulate the editors of the Boston Phoenix, who had the courage to admit that their primary reason for not publishing the cartoons is "fear of retaliation from...bloodthirsty Islamists who seek to impose their will on those who do not believe as they do...Simply stated, we are being terrorized..."
Now that's backbone!

Todd Hammond
Valtice, Czech Republic
[18/02/2006] : I have been watching CNN quite often as that is the only outside news channel we can get on TV here in China. Quite often they will have a guest representing Islam. According to their guests, no pictures or drawings of any prophet should be displayed including pictures of Jesus Christ. There are pictures and drawings of Jesus Christ all over the world. When was the last time they protested and rioted over that? If people want to talk about double standards then lets talk about that.
Jay Mattner
P.R China
[17/02/2006] : I am somewhat surprised to see how surprised everybody is over the Islamists' outrage. For crying out loud, what they're doing is what all religions (in their right mind) would (or should) do. In fact, all ideologies, including religions. They stand for something, they tell you what to believe, how to believe, etc. The fact this approach doesn't work in the so-called Western societies any longer may be a sign that we have at long last achieved a modicum of enlightenment, but it is also a sign that most religions in the West have lost their raison d'etre. So far as I'm concerned, good for us, to a degree, but still, being shocked by the shocked reaction in the Muslim countries is a sign of either ignorance, or hypocrisy, or, Heavens forbid, both.
Peter Adler
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada




The Prague Post Online contains a selection of articles that have been printed in
The Prague Post, a weekly newspaper published in the Czech Republic.
To subscribe to the print paper, click here.
Unauthorized reproduction is strictly prohibited.